On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 04:14:36PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> The 1.7 files
> were renamed in 1.8 to
> and this causes conflicts when backporting changes from trunk. On the
> branch 1.7.x-r1475724 this was resolved by doing a subtree merge and
> thus recording subtree mergeinfo.
> I now want to backport r1481010 and I'm wondering if using subtree
> merges is the best way to handle this. My first instinct was to do a
> whole branch merge and resolve the conflicts to leave a mergeinfo change
> on the root. Then I noticed that the 1.7.x-r1475724 branch had takes a
> different approach. Does it matter which approach is used?
I would say just use whichever approach you like best.
FWIW, I would also run the merge on the root, and then resolve
the tree conflict by running a subtree merge on the file itself.
Or perhaps even applying a patch instead of running the subtree
merge ('svn diff', edit filename in patch file, and 'svn patch').
Maybe Subversion 1.9 will finally make this easier? :)
Received on 2013-05-10 17:24:38 CEST