Re: Issue 4359 fix not merged to 1.8.x

Should backport.pl attempt to catch such a situation?

I'm inclined to say "No", since the entry should not have been moved
below the "Approved" header and given three +1 votes if it had a revnum
typo. (But it should be easy to inject an 'svn log -qvr | wc -l > 4' type
check, if people prefer that.)

Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:02:14 +0100:
> Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> writes:
>
> > It looks like the wrong revision number was given in STATUS, as it's a
> > tomcat commit:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1471029
>
> r1471028 is the revision that should have been proposed/voted/merged.
>
> --
> Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
> http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Received on 2013-04-24 15:07:33 CEST