[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Filenames with trailing newlines wreak havoc

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:03:36 -0700

Apache security folks please provide us a CVE for this.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> When a file with a trailing newline (ASCII 0x0a) has made its way into
> the repository, there are various areas of the system that exhibit failure
> modes. Failure modes I observed in one particular case are discussed below.
> I intend to file separate issues for each failure mode to keep track of
> them, rather than filing one giant issue for them all. Though perhaps
> a meta-issue that depends on the other issues would be useful.
> In the case observed there was a file, added in a revision rX, which had
> a trailing newline in its name. The file was added along with its parent
> directory (which was also new in rX) and alongside several other files
> in the same directory which did not have trailing newlines in their names.
> The server was running Subversion 1.7.8, but might have been running
> an older release at the time when rX was committed.
> All commands listed below were run with Subversion 1.7.8.
> Immediately visible problems were:
> svnadmin verify resulted in an error for the revision: 'svnadmin: E160013: File not found: ...')
> svnsync failed to sync the revision ('svnsync: E160013: File not found: ...')
> However, the directory at rX could be listed (with svn ls) and checked
> out successfully.
> During checkout, RA layers were behaving inconsistently.
> Checkout via ra_svn and ra_local resulted in the expected filename
> with \n (0x0a) as the last byte both in wc.db (local_relpath NODES
> column) and on disk.
> However, ra_neon (didn't try serf) checked the file out with a trailing
> space (0x20) instead of a trailing newline. The filename was stored with
> a trailing 0x20 in wc.db as well as on disk.
> Examining the FSFS revision file [*] of rX showed that the filename was
> stored with a newline as part of its parent directory's representation.
> [*] For those who didn't know, the FSFS revision file format is documented
> here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/structure
> Let's call the parent directory 'A', and the file in question 'alpha\n'.
> A file named 'alpha\n' added in r1 might appear like this in its parent
> directory's representation (i.e. the rep of 'A'):
> ============
> K 6
> alpha
> V 17
> file 2-1.0.r1/122
> ============
> However, the cpath: field within the file's own representation did not
> contain the trailing newline.
> Also, the file was listed in the changed-paths data section without
> the trailing newline. Note that the FSFS format docs say "The changed-path
> data is represented as a series of changed-path items, each consisting of
> two lines." -- i.e. a trailing newline is considered to be part of revision
> file data, rather than the filename.
> Furthermore, several children of the newly-added-in rX 'A' directory
> were missing from the changed-paths list in the revision file, for an
> unkown reason.
> More precisely, children listed after 'alpha\n' in the rep of A were
> missing from the changed paths list. This was not detected by 'svnadmin
> verify' (which, in my opinion, is a bug) but was detected by 'svnsync'
> when a later revision rY referred to one of the missing children in
> copyfrom information. It turned out that the slave server was missing
> any children of A not listed in the changed-paths list in the rX
> revision file on the master server. What kind of consistency checks
> could prevent this from happening remains to be determined. Perhaps
> 'svnadmin verify' could cross-check the changed paths list with node-rev
> IDs which appear in the revision's directory listings?
> The revision rX could be fixed by removing the trailing newline from the
> filename in the parent directory's representation, and adjusting the
> rep's length and checksum information accordingly. About two dozen other
> revisions had to be adjusted as well because they listed the file
> 'alpha\n' as part of the 'A' directory rep (which is of course written
> out in its entirety whenever a revision changes some child of 'A').
> Also, the changed-paths list of rX had to be extended to add the missing
> newly added children of A. Other revisions had to be checked for similar
> omissions in the changed-paths list.
> How the filename entered the repository is not known with absolute
> certainty. The current theory, based on discussion with the revision's
> author, is that the file was checked in using Eclipse with SVNKit 1.6
> and was not refused by the Subversion server at the time.
> Attempting the reproduce this problem with a stock Subversion client
> in a naive way fails because libsvn_client refuses to add such files
> to version control in the first place:
> subversion/svn/add-cmd.c:86: (apr_err=160005)
> subversion/svn/util.c:621: (apr_err=160005)
> subversion/libsvn_client/add.c:1031: (apr_err=160005)
> subversion/libsvn_client/add.c:937: (apr_err=160005)
> subversion/libsvn_client/add.c:320: (apr_err=160005)
> subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c:1004: (apr_err=160005)
> subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c:679: (apr_err=160005)
> subversion/libsvn_subr/path.c:1231: (apr_err=160005)
> svn: E160005: Invalid control character '0x0a' in path '/tmp/wc/alpha\012'
> This error does not seem to be triggered by our test suite, which
> is bad because it would have allowed the SVNKit developers to prevent
> this problem from happening (they use our test suite to test their
> Java-based implementation of Subversion). There is a tab_test() in
> commit_tests.py, but that test only tries a tab, not a newline character.
> We should add some C tests as well to verify API behaviour at the
> client layer and at the repos layer.
> Given the ripple effects of this problem in FSFS revision files I think
> we should ensure that the Subversion server blocks such filenames from
> entering the repository (any repository, FSFS and BDB). It seems FSFS format
> changes would be required to support filenames with trailing newlines
> properly, an effort which isn't worth the gain in my opinion.
> And given the ripple effects seen in areas such as repository verification,
> svnsync, and ra_neon, I don't think we can afford to call this a supported
> use case until all components of the system have been fixed to handle
> filenames with trailing newlines properly.
> Comments and opinions are very welcome. I intend to make sure that this
> problem cannot happen with future Subversion releases, and welcome any
> input and help I can get.
Received on 2013-04-14 19:04:13 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.