I tend to think the absolute URL syntax is better for our
documentation since the only way the relative URL works is if you run
it while your CWD is in a working copy in that repo.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:32 AM, <danielsh_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Fri Apr 12 13:32:31 2013
> New Revision: 1467266
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1467266
> Log:
> * docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html
> (#release-branches): Use the short URL syntax.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html
>
> Modified: subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html?rev=1467266&r1=1467265&r2=1467266&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html (original)
> +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html Fri Apr 12 13:32:31 2013
> @@ -1126,8 +1126,8 @@ A.B with the version you're preparing, e
> <ul>
> <li><p>Create the new release branch with a server-side copy:</p>
> <pre>
> - svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk \
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/A.B.x \
> + svn cp ^/subversion/trunk \
> + ^/subversion/branches/A.B.x \
> -m "Create A.B.x release branch."
> </pre></li>
>
>
Received on 2013-04-12 16:46:54 CEST