[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Re-localise conflict prompt

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:21:58 +0200

On 11.04.2013 20:47, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> Do you really claim that any set of single- and two-letter codes is as
> good as another? I don't think so -- I believe "p" to be better
> answer for "postpone" than "4" or "mc" in English, one that will both
> reach the state of memorisation much quicker and reduce the risk of
> errors.
>
> And if you would agree to that, why should we deny others the same
> benefits?

For the same reason that I'd deny them the dubious benefit of, e.g., the
following:

    nepredznačeno celo_Å¡tevilo Fibonacci(nepredznačeno celo_Å¡tevilo N)
    zaviti_oklepaj
        Äe (N je_enako 0 ali N je_enako 1)
            vrni 1,
        sicer
            vrni Fibonacci(N odÅ¡tej 1) priÅ¡tej Fibonacci(N odÅ¡tej 2).
    zaviti_zaklepaj

instead of

    unsigned int Fibonacci(unsigned int N)
    {
        if (N == 0 || N == 1)
            return 1;
        else
            return Fibonacci(N - 1) + Fibonacci(N - 2);
    }

-- Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-04-12 12:22:38 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.