[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Consistency between 'update' and 'switch' APIs

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:24:50 -0400

On 04/06/2013 03:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> [...] So I agree, both switch and update should carry the
>>> server-recognized meaning of 'ignore-ancestry' in both the client and
>>> RA layers.
>
> In r1465292 I added the 'ignore_ancestry' flag to the RA 'update' APIs,
> for consistency with 'switch'.
>
> That's enough to satisfy my symmetry cravings at the moment.

Sounds good. 

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2013-04-08 15:25:24 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.