Re: [PATCH] Sleep for timestamps in the right places
Julian Foad wrote:
>>[...] As it is
>> right now if you're keeping your clocks in sync it should work okay.
>> But unless I'm missing something that's not the case after this
> That's true, given that the current implementation doesn't look at the
> timestamps when deciding whether or how long to sleep. So the safe thing to do
> is reintroduce a sleep even if using commit times, for all applicable operations
> (checkout, update, switch, revert).
> I'll commit this soon. (Running tests now.)
Received on 2013-04-04 23:20:39 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev