Re: [PATCH] Sleep for timestamps in the right places

Julian Foad wrote:

>>[...]   As it is
>> right now if you're keeping your clocks in sync it should work okay.
>> But unless I'm missing something that's not the case after this
>> change.
>
> That's true, given that the current implementation doesn't look at the
> timestamps when deciding whether or how long to sleep.  So the safe thing to do
> is reintroduce a sleep even if using commit times, for all applicable operations
> (checkout, update, switch, revert).
>
> I'll commit this soon.  (Running tests now.)

r1464769.

- Julian
Received on 2013-04-04 23:20:39 CEST