On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>wrote:
> Hi Stefan.
> In <svn.apache.org/r1390443>, you wrote:
> Merge third batch of changes from the 10Gb branch.
> Switch ra_svn to templated commands.
> Revisions 1388276,1390209
> I assume the main reason for this change is to remove the run-time
> overhead of parsing a format string, and in that respect it seems fine.
> In terms of API style, however, it seems to me that you might as well make
> the API have a dedicated function for each RA command instead of using this
> single function with a template parameter. Then we would have the benefit
> of static checking of the number and types of the arguments. The
> implementation of this 'templated' API pretty much ends up calling a
> specific function per command anyway. I'm sure an implementation with
> dedicated functions would be shorter in source code too (and a nanosecond
> quicker as well :-).
> Does that sound good?
It does. We always had an interface comprising
of all these commands - we are simply changing
the way to express / codify it (format string ->
template / enum -> function).
*Join one of our free daily demo sessions on* *Scaling Subversion for the
Received on 2013-04-03 12:43:34 CEST