On 27.03.2013 16:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:20 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> On 03/27/2013 11:03 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:52:04AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>>>> I think we'll have to block these paths at the FS layer.
>>>> If FSFS is fundamentally unable to support these types of paths, then sure,
>>>> let's go ahead and protect against the failure at that level. But please
>>>> don't overreach here -- block only the paths that FSFS simply cannot deal
>>>> with. There have been other tools built atop the FS layer in the past
>>>> (wikis, etc.) and could be in the future -- this is, after all, why we have
>>>> distinct FS and repos APIs -- and we shouldn't be artificially limiting what
>>>> folks can do with the that API.
>>> That's fine. The fix I've committed and proposed for backport applies
>>> the large hammer and blocks any control characters. If there's a case
>>> to be made for relaxing this check I'm happy to do that.
>> Sorry, but I'm -1 on that change. How did this expand from "trailing
>> newlines" to "any control character"?
> I'm with Mike here.
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-03-27 17:07:59 CET