[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Consistency between 'update' and 'switch' APIs

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:47:54 +0000

Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> Backwards compatibility. svn_repos_dir_delta had ignore-ancestry since
> 1.0, it was added in r845731, and switch operated with ignore-ancestry
> set false. r1087015 started making switch require history between the

Oops! Set true, i.e. ancestry was ignored.

> nodes, with a switch to get the old behaviour. At this stage the
> history check was purely a client side check of the relationship between
> the nodes, the RA/repos layers still ignored ancestry during switch.
> r1449413 passes the ignore-ancestry flag over RA to repos so that switch
> now takes full account of ancestry.

Received on 2013-03-18 14:48:42 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.