Re: [svnbench] Failed to build Revision: 1449572.

Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> writes:

> Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:09:55 +0000:
>> Neels Hofmeyr <neels_at_elego.de> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:04:05 +0200
>> > Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>> >
>> >> /usr/local/serf-current was serf-1.2.x-r1707. I've installed 1.2.0
>> >> and updated the self-current symlink accordingly.
>> >
>> > No, the build has its own source trees. You know, it's one of those
>> > "complete" builds that you do like so much ;)
>>
>> Which version of SQLite is used?
>
> 3.7.12.1

I was trying to see if that would explain why the charts show copy as a
regression. The charts show copy performance fluctuating wildly however
I think that may be a false alarm. Looking at the script the only copy
that I can see is an URL-to-URL copy; a copy like that has nothing to do
with working copy performance and may well be dominated by program
startup costs.

-- 
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download