[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svn add and inconsistent line endings.

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:59:20 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:brane_at_wandisco.com]
> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 17:31
> To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>
> On 24.02.2013 17:00, Stefan Küng wrote:
> > On 24.02.2013 16:47, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 15:39
> >>> To: Subversion Development
> >>> Subject: svn add and inconsistent line endings
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> When auto-props are set up for e.g., cpp files that set the
> >>> svn:eol-style property, adding those files is not possible if the file
> >>> has inconsistent line endings.
> >>> The --force flag won't help either, the only way to add the file is to
> >>> first fix the line endings in an editor.
> >>> Or add the file with --no-auto-props and then add the properties later.
> >>>
> >>> I think this situation is not good.
> >>> Maybe another param added to svn_client_add5 that ignores the EOL
> >>> check?
> >>> Or just pass the 'force' flag on to svn_wc__canonicalize_props()
> >>> instead
> >>> of passing 'false' unconditionally in libsvn_wc\adm_ops.c,
> >>> svn_wc_add_from_disk2() ?
> >>
> >> I don't think simply ignoring this and allowing the add to continue is a
> >> good enough solution.
> >>
> >> Just passing the skip checks flags will allow adding many wrong
> >> properties
> >> which will cause a lot of grief later, and I would guess adding the file
> >> would just delay the error until we try to commit this file.
> >>
> >>
> >> But looking at this from the AnkhSVN side, I would like to have some
> >> api to
> >> make the eols on files consistent... Would this work for you?
> >
> > The API already exists, since when passing the --force flag to the
> > propset command (adding the svn:eol-style property), then the file is
> > automatically adjusted.
> >
> > I agree that the add command should still check the other properties.
> > So why not add a separate flag to only skip the EOL check?
> > Or maybe just automatically adjust the EOLs when adding the file? I
> > never understood why that check is there.
>
> I'd say that "force" should always do the same thing for equivalent
> cases, so in this case, it should tell the library to adjust line
> endings, if that's what "svn propset" does. Autoprops should behave
> exactly as if a series of propsets were issued.

svn add --force allows not failing on already versioned files. It is not passed further into the api.

You suggestion of --force should just be handed down to be equivalent, makes --force a global 'feel free to break any assumptions' flag, and that is why in general we are deprecating --force.
(We should introduce specific arguments when overrides are necessary. Such as we did on 'svn merge', 'svn switch', etc.)

        Bert

>
> -- Brane
>
> --
> Branko Čibej
> Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-02-24 19:00:00 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.