Re: [RFC] Build System Documentation

On 22/02/13 00:45, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> How about just linking to a revnum wherein a standalone application was
> added? That's less likely to get out of date.
>
> For example
>
> % svn log -qv -l1 -r 1:HEAD subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r965054 | danielsh | 2010-07-17 14:23:38 +0300 (Sat, 17 Jul 2010)
> Changed paths:
> M /subversion/branches/atomic-revprop/build.conf
> M /subversion/branches/atomic-revprop/subversion/tests/cmdline
> A /subversion/branches/atomic-revprop/subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c
> ...
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

when I then try: svn diff -c 965054 I get a silent failure.

However,

svn blame subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c

clearly shows that the revision 965054 has contents.

What is going on?
Received on 2013-02-24 18:21:52 CET