On 22.02.2013 18:35, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2013 10:51 AM, "Ben Reser" <ben_at_reser.org
> <mailto:ben_at_reser.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Philip Martin
> > <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com <mailto:philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>> wrote:
> > > Did you mean an in-tree build rather than a static build? I don't
> think
> > > we support building serf in-tree.
> >
> > Indeed we do not support in-tree serf builds. Nor is it something
> > that is likely to be easy to use, since serf is now using SCons for
> > their build system.
> >
> > We should probably add a note before 1.8 release explaining this since
> > you can't simply ./get_deps.sh to cover this dependency now like you
> > could with neon.
>
> I'd prefer we remove all in-tree builds, except for the private
> copy/build of sqlite. Building that way was a workaround for when our
> dependencies where "new on the scene" and were not regularly available
> as their own packages/install.
>
But they're not, and a case in point is the as-yet-unreleased Serf 1.2,
which 1.8 will depend on, and which isn't likely to get into any major
releases within 6 months of the Subversion (or Serf) release. (And
neither is SVN, fwiw).
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-02-22 18:42:11 CET