On 22.02.2013 15:34, Philip Martin wrote:
> Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>
>> On 22.02.2013 13:32, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> The configure option --with-ssl seems to be a remnant of our neon
>>> support, it allowed --with-ssl to be passed to an in-tree neon build.
>>> I think it can be removed.
>>>
>>> The --with-gssapi option seems to be related to serf but I don't
>>> understand it. It causes the gssapi libraries to be added to the link
>>> but why is that necessary? Doesn't serf itself add the libraries it
>>> needs? This config option also defines SVN_RA_SERF_HAVE_GSSAPI which
>>> seems to be unused. Can we remove --with-gssapi as well?
>> Not for builds that link serf statically.
> Why not? Isn't serf supposed to tell us which libraries it needs? Why
> is gssapi different from any other library?
Ah, I misunderstood this to mean "remove option implies don't link
library." Indeed, Serf's pkg-config should DTRT.
Sorry for the confusion.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-02-22 15:59:07 CET