[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Procedure for making web page changes

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:06:14 +0200

Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:57:13 +0000:
> On 20/01/13 05:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 00:15:46 +0000:
>>> On 03/01/13 04:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>>> + <li>Enable Server Side Includes for the relevant DocumentRoot. The
>>>>> + relevant Apache directive is:
>>>>> + <pre> Options +Include
>>>>
>>>> What about:
>>>>
>>>> AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .html
>>>>
>>> Do we actually need this? I've not put it in since I was only
>>> documenting the steps I used.
>>
>> Isn't it required to enable SSI?
>
> My tests seem to suggest that the xbithack is sufficient.
>
> It appears to be an either-or decision, the method I've used allows to
> publish by setting the execute bit, the other way simply publishes all
> docs in that dir that have the matching extension, see:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/ssi.html#configuring

I see. The interesting part is that I asked about
    AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .html
because httpd.conf has it enabled for us specifically. I Also tested by
hand and confirmed that /www/subversion.apache.org/index2.html has SSI
directives parsed even if it lacks a +x bit. So it seems we should
migrate to AddOutputFilter --- both in your patch and in the live
site's .htaccess,*.html files. Do you agree?
Received on 2013-02-19 14:06:54 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.