[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Coniguring 301/302 redirects to track an fspath rename

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:52:09 +0100

a) I know it's not a call for infra to make
b) if you can't lead a civil conversation, you may as well send it to
/dev/null for all the good it'll do.

-- Brane

On 05.02.2013 18:36, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> AFAICT if I really wanted this feature myself
> I could write a perl script that wraps svn client calls
> and DTRT with the error message in less than 20 LOC.
> You don't have to act like dicks towards people
> who are trying to take advantage of newer features
> you ostensibly support- the only reason we're discussing
> relocation features is because that's all you currently
> offer. If you start supporting in-repo switch ops,
> hallelujah.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer_at_yahoo.com>
> *To:* Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>;
> "dev_at_subversion.apache.org" <dev_at_subversion.apache.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 5, 2013 12:08 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Coniguring 301/302 redirects to track an fspath rename
>
> 1) that's not a decision for infra to make.
> 2) the svn client even with 1.6 now reports
> the proper error message indicating the location
> of the new url. All infra needs is for the svn client
> to provide a config option to actually interpret
> the error status and take meaningful action itself.
> This doesn't sound like rocket science to me,
> no matter how screwed up the current level of
> support for redirects may be.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
> *To:* dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 5, 2013 11:50 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Coniguring 301/302 redirects to track an fspath
> rename
>
> On 05.02.2013 16:07, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > So, I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but this entire
> exercise
> > is a giant waste of time and energy.
>
> I was going to say it'd be much better overall to create
> podling trees
> in SVN in the location they'd have when they graduate, as has
> already
> been half-way done with mailing lists.
>
> -- Brane
>
> --
> Branko Čibej
> Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
> <http://www.wandisco.com/>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-02-05 19:52:43 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.