Branko ÄŒibej wrote:
> On 24.01.2013 00:42, Andreas Stieger wrote:
>> I found the following output of "svn mergeinfo" troublesome to
>> localize.
>>
>>   youngest last       repos.
>>   common  full  tip of  path of
>>   ancestor merge  branch  branch
>>
>> Â Â 2Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6Â Â Â
>> Â Â |Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â
>> Â Â Â Â --| |------------Â Â Â Â branches/branch1
>> Â Â Â Â /Â Â Â Â /Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
>> Â Â Â /Â Â Â Â /Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
>> Â -------| |------------Â Â Â Â trunk
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5Â Â Â Â 6Â Â Â
>>
>> Would something like this not be better?
>>
>> Â Â youngest common ancestor
>> Â Â |Â Â Â Â last full merge
>> Â Â |Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â Â tip of branch
>> Â Â |Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â Â repository path
>>
>> Â Â 2Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6Â Â Â
>> Â Â |Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â
>> Â Â Â Â --| |------------Â Â Â Â branches/branch1
>> Â Â Â Â /Â Â Â Â /Â Â Â Â Â Â
>> Â Â Â /Â Â Â Â /Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
>> Â -------| |------------Â Â Â Â trunk
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â Â |Â Â Â
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5Â Â Â Â 6Â Â Â
>
> I agree your suggested layout is easier to translate. However ...
>
>> A patch to this effect is attached for consideration.
>>
>> [[[
>> make mergeinfo diagram column headings l10n friendly
>>
>> * subversion/svn/mergeinfo-cmd.c
>> Â (mergeinfo_diagram): use one line per column heading and
>> Â Â vertical lines, leaving room for l10n
>> ]]]
Sounds good to me. +1.
> The patch itself still makes translators deal with the position of the
> vertical bars. If we're going to change the layout, we may as well make
> it even easier for translators so that they don't have to worry about
> positioning, just translating the headings.
Yes, that would be even better.
- Julian
Received on 2013-01-24 15:03:01 CET