[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svnbench charts interpretation

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:05:43 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neels Hofmeyr [mailto:neels_at_elego.de]
> Sent: maandag 21 januari 2013 17:19
> To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svnbench charts interpretation

> *merge* also is pretty consistently faster by a quarter to a third,
> again taking the longest time (and consequently gaining the most speed)
> in the 5x5 case. I'd say "woot!" if I didn't know that most of the
> merge slowness people usually complain about is probably coming from the
> network layers and not from libsvn_wc anyway. So just a hopeful: "nice!"

The amount of network IO is also reduced for 1.8.
We used to retrieve top much information for every not changed directory,
which we now identify correctly as not relevant.

But this is mostly in the 'diff' part of the merge, not the 'merge' code

Received on 2013-01-21 23:06:30 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.