[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1434913 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:12:30 +0000

"Bert Huijben" <bert_at_qqmail.nl> writes:

> This problem will never occur with a storing moved-from in BASE
> (op-depth 0). (Moved-from is always stored in the op-root of the
> addition, so this can never have this problem... The problem is in the
> moved-to scheme)

I think the two schemes are equivalent. The implementations are
different but the data stored in either scheme can be transformed into
the data stored in the other without any losses. (I assume the BASE
scheme is tweaked to allow tracking moves in copies by storing in the
lowest op-depth normal node.) Some operations may be simpler to
implement in one scheme compared to the other, and maybe one is simpler
overall, but I think each scheme has operations that are easier/harder
to implement.

Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
Received on 2013-01-18 20:13:10 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.