Re: ra_replay: Uncovering a latent design failure
On 01/11/2013 02:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Actually, I think I'll take a slightly differently approach here. Rather
> than have the client hit the "me resource" (which represents the whole
> repository), I'll have it hit the revision resource associated with the
> single revision that's being replayed.
> That way, requests to replay revisions which don't exist will 404 (as we'd
> expect), plus we won't have to marshal the revision number in the request
> body -- just the filtering path. (In fact, in the future, we may decide to
> allow multiple filtering paths here.)
Fixed in r1432357.
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
Received on 2013-01-12 02:56:49 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev