Re: Do we expect default ignores when no ignores are defined

Paul Burba wrote:

> I'm merely pointing out that the current behavior regarding the
> *default* is bizarre IMO.  I could have the global-ignores option
> *purposefully* commented out/not-present in all four Windows configs
> because I don't want to ignore anything, but Subversion tries to
> outwit me and assumes the default.  Seems completely
> wrong/counter-intuitive to me.

FWIW I too think it's stupid that we have this hard-coded default.  (It wouldn't be quite so stupid if we didn't force the creation of a config file on every run.)  But ther ya go.

- Julian
Received on 2013-01-11 22:51:06 CET