RE: svn commit: r1431633 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/cleanup.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.h tests/cmdline/wc_tests.py

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:bert_at_qqmail.nl]
> Sent: vrijdag 11 januari 2013 14:12
> To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1431633 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> libsvn_wc/cleanup.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.h
> tests/cmdline/wc_tests.py
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: brane_at_apache.org [mailto:brane_at_apache.org]
> > Sent: donderdag 10 januari 2013 21:55
> > To: commits_at_subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: svn commit: r1431633 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> > libsvn_wc/cleanup.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.h
> > tests/cmdline/wc_tests.py
> >
> > Author: brane
> > Date: Thu Jan 10 20:54:40 2013
> > New Revision: 1431633
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1431633&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Fix issue #4267 (better message when cleanup not run on lock root); but
> > instead
> > of concocting a better error message, just always run cleanup on the lock
> > root.
>
> During WC-NG development we explicitly decided not to do this, because
> some users run operations on different parts of their working copy at once.
[Already answered on IRC]

No, we decided not to always run it on the wcroot.

This change by itself is safe, and should really improve usability.

Thanks Brane,

        Bert
Received on 2013-01-11 14:24:19 CET