[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:28:48 +0200

Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:50:55 +0100:
> On 07.01.2013 12:46, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Which points out that when we next rewrite the FS library, we should
> > re-draw the link between libsvn_fs and libsvn_fs_foo
> Agreed.
> > --- in a manner that avoids us having to implement all
> > these little features for each backend separately...
> ... but definitely not for this reason. I do /not/ want my abstract
> interface to dictate how to, e.g., design the directory index in the
> filesystem implementation.

Neither do I :) I was assuming we could provide a libsvn_fs_util helper
that constructs a new dir rep; FS backends can elect to use that, or
roll their own.
Received on 2013-01-07 13:29:43 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.