[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:06:53 +0000

Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> Caching is part of the FSFS backend. One would assume that a key-value
> database like BDB would have its own cache, which is therefore
> implicitly part of the BDB back-end.

It's not directly comparable to the FSFS in-memory cache but BDB does
have a cache. The performance of the BDB cache can be examined using:

 db5.1_stat -h repo/db -m

I guess the cache can be tuned via repo/db/DB_CONFIG.

Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
Received on 2013-01-07 12:07:44 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.