Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!

Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> Caching is part of the FSFS backend. One would assume that a key-value
> database like BDB would have its own cache, which is therefore
> implicitly part of the BDB back-end.

It's not directly comparable to the FSFS in-memory cache but BDB does
have a cache. The performance of the BDB cache can be examined using:

 db5.1_stat -h repo/db -m

I guess the cache can be tuned via repo/db/DB_CONFIG.

-- 
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download