[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 03:53:08 +0100

On 06.01.2013 03:01, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hey there,

Thanks for taking time to do the measurements, Stefan!

> So, I did some measurement based with a mirror of the boost repository.
> That is a 82,362 revs, 971,599 changes repository mainly containing
> source code. It is surprising how much BDB has fallen behind.
> Tests were run on 64 bit Ubuntu 12.10 with BDB 5.1. Repository configs,
> created with latest /trunk:
> (1): --fs-type bdb --bdb-txn-nosync; auto log removal implied

This happens to be the fastest configuration for BDB repositories;
however, it's somewhat useless for production use.

Still ... the numbers you got are even worse than I expected.

-- Brane

Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-01-06 03:53:47 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.