[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Second try at build system changes

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:23:01 +0100

On 21.12.2012 18:12, Philip Martin wrote:
> Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>
>> On 21.12.2012 18:03, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 21.12.2012 18:02, Philip Martin wrote:
>>>> Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 21.12.2012 16:36, Philip Martin wrote:
>>>>>> So the build system used to strip -std=c89 and now does not. If I
>>>>>> remove -std=c89 from SWIG_RB_COMPILE in Makefile the build works.
>>>>> Thanks. Apparently I either missed that somehow, or this option came
>>>>> from the Ruby compile flags, not ours. Will try to fix.
>>>> I added it when I ran configure.
>>> Oh. Dare I say, "don't do that"? :)
>> Just to be clear: The intent of the changes is, amongst other things,
>> that configure determines these kinds of flags and keeps them in a
>> separate variable, precisely so that we don't have to strip them from
>> anywhere. Of course, running "env CFLAGS=-ansi ./configure" defeats that.
>>
>> I'd prefer to not support that kind of usage.
> trunk doesn't add a -std flag and I wanted to build with one. I'd like
> a system that allows me to specify arbitrary flags that get used to
> compile our code but that do not get used when compiling "other"
> generated code.

Does "make EXTRA_CFLAGS=..." not give you exactly that?

-- Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2012-12-21 18:23:40 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.