Re: [PATCH] Improve svn_checksum_t bindings in SWIG
Shivani Poddar wrote on Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 00:50:03 +0530:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > Yeah, you're right. Ultimately that's because svn_checksum_size takes
> > a checksum rather than a checksum kind.
> > What should we do then?
> > - revv svn_checksum_size to take an svn_checksum_kind_t?
> Does this line mean something like:
> LENGTH =
Sorry. "Revv" is a term related to C APIs: it means write
svn_checksum_size2() and deprecated svn_checksum_size().
Received on 2012-12-11 20:27:40 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev