Re: svn commit: r1415864 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/update.c

On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:36:30AM -0500, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Here's my suggestion for consideration - let's experiment with this setting
> in the beta release process with the setting as-is - that is we always do
> the parallel updates unconditionally (except perhaps when svnrdump is being
> stupid). If we get real users complaining about the update during that
> cycle, we can then figure out either switching the default and/or adding a
> config-option or even allowing some control via capabilities exchange.
>
> Does that sound reasonable? -- justin

Why wait until beta? Can't we get such feedback by asking people to test the
nightly releases, or by tagging r1415926 and releasing it as pre-alpha?
Received on 2012-12-01 07:39:30 CET