[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.8 Progress

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:24:04 -0500

On 11/30/2012 01:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> I'm adding send-all support to ra_serf right now, but will leave it #if'd
>> out until we decide in what scenarios we wish to use it.
>>
> Wow! That's great! Are you going to add it to existing code or
> implement separate update_editor? Implementing separate update_editor
> may be better since current implementation is extremely overloaded.

I suspect right now that there's far too much in common between the two
implementations for me to justify a separate "editor". (Though, by "editor"
I assume you mean only the XML-to-editor layer which lives in
ra_serf/update.c, not the update editor itself.)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2012-11-30 19:24:40 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.