RE: 1.8 Progress
From: Gavin Baumanis <gavinb_at_thespidernet.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:15:52 +1100
[GB: ] Hi Everyone,
I'd also like to add, that if the end-game is; we are going to "just" support serf, then surely the answer is to spend time correcting the issues in serf that people have noted, as opposed to spending time re-inserting neon?
It might just be stating the obvious - but if we can’t get serf to where it needs to be for a 1.8 release of SVN - then surely it is prudent to re-insert ra_neon back into SVN and make 1.9 the goal for being serf-only?
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.