[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: multiple targets for 'svnlook propget'

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:58:40 +0000 (GMT)


Subversion Live 2012 - 2 Days: training, networking, demos & more! http://bit.ly/NgUaRi
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
----- Original Message -----
> From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
> To: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
> Cc: Subversion Development <dev_at_subversion.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, 16 November 2012, 8:54
> Subject: Re: multiple targets for 'svnlook propget'
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> 
> wrote:
>>  Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>  Right now, 'svnlook propget' supports only a single 
>>>  argument:
>>>      usage: 1. svnlook propget REPOS_PATH PROPNAME PATH_IN_REPOS
>>>  I think it would be useful to support multiple targets, like 'svn
>>>  propget'. That would make it much faster to gather all props set
>>>  during a transaction, for instance in a pre-commit hook:
>>>      svnlook propget -t $TXN $REPOS svn:eol-style `svnlook changed -t
>>>  $TXN $REPOS`
>>>  The only complication I see, is that the output for multiple targets
>>>  has to write the node for which the properties are shown.
>>>  Looking at 'svn propget' for inspiration, we see that it 
> doesn't
>>>  output the node when there is only one target. But it does when there
>>>  are multiple targets. I guess 'svnlook propget' could implement 
> the
>>>  same behavior, which means that the output for single target remains
>>>  backwards compatible (at the cost of slight increase of complexity for
>>>  scripts that parse that output -> they have to know if they passed 
> one
>>>  or mutiple targets).
>>>  Current output of 'svn propget':
>>>      $ svn pg svn:eol-style ^/file.txt
>>>      native
>>>      $ svn pg svn:eol-style ^/file.txt ^/binary.exe ^/file2.txt
>>>     http://my.svn.server/svn/file.txt - native
>>>     http://my.svn.server/svn/file2.txt - native
>>>  (As you can see, the it simply does not output the targets that 
> don't
>>>  have the property, and shows the actual target for every file that
>>>  does)
>>>  Or with working copy targets:
>>>      $ svn pg svn:eol-style file.txt binary.exe file2.txt
>>>      file.txt - native
>>>      file2.txt - native
>>>  Now, when we look at the output of 'svnlook propget':
>>>      $ svnlook pg repos svn:eol-style file.txt
>>>      native
>>>  We could have following multi-target output:
>>>      $ svnlook pg repos svn:eol-style file.txt binary.exe file2.txt
>>>      file.txt - native
>>>      file2.txt - native
>>>  Thoughts?
>>>  P.S.: This multi-target output isn't very parseable for multi-line
>>>  properties. Currently, 'svn propget' also has this problem, but 
> users
>>>  can use --xml to get machine-readable output.
>>  I added a "svn propget --verbose" mode (in 1.7 I think) to 
> resolve that problem.  It uses the same format as "svn proplist 
> --verbose", which is like this:
>>  [[[
>>  $ svn pg -vR svn:ignore  # selected bits of output are shown
>>  Properties on 'subversion/bindings/ctypes-python/csvn/ext':
>>    svn:ignore
>>      *.pyc
>>  Properties on 'subversion/mod_dav_svn/reports':
>>    svn:ignore
>>      .libs
>>  Properties on 'contrib/server-side/svnstsw/include':
>>    svn:ignore
>>      Makefile
>>      Makefile.in
>>  ]]]
>>  If the email system hasn't mangled the white space, you should be able 
> to see that the prop name is indented by two spaces and the value by four 
> spaces, and newlines in the value are preserved (with exactly one LF added to 
> ensure there is a line break in the output) so it's fully parseable.
>>>  Maybe 'svnlook propget'
>>>  should eventually also grow a --xml option to handle this. But I'd 
> say
>>>  that's yet another feature. For now, I would be happy if svnlook 
> could
>>>  already do "plain" output for multiple targets, which can 
> already be
>>>  useful/parseable for single-line properties like svn:eol-style.
>>  Given that 'svnlook' is very much expected to be used by scripts 
> ('svn' serves most human-interaction cases), I don't see 
> implementing the "plain" output is a good idea.
>>  But +1 on implementing the "svn pg -v" format.
> Ok, but then you probably mean that I should add two things:
> 1) Add multi-target support to 'svnlook pg'
> 2) Add -v to 'svnlook pg', format like 'svn pg -v'
> The combination of 1 and 2 would then give us a parseable output for
> multiple targets.
> But I guess I shouldn't forbid the use of 1 without 2, right? I think
> it would be strange to say "cannot use multiple arguments without
> --verbose" ...
> So it seems I should also provide a format for the multi-arg case
> without -v ... like the current format of 'svn pg' without -v.
> I also note that the same enhancement can't easily be made for
> proplist. Mainly because 'svnlook pl' already has a --verbose option,
> so we can't change the output of 'svnlook pl --verbose' with a 
> single
> target without breaking backwards compatibility.
> - 'svn pl' always shows "Properties on 'XXX':" 
> (whether for single
> target or multiple targets, whether verbose or not)
> - 'svnlook pl' does not, and when used with --verbose it doesn't
> indent multiline properties like 'svn pl' does.
> [[[
> $ svn pl sources --verbose
> Properties on 'sources':
>   svn:ignore
>     .classpath
>     .settings
>     .project
> $ svnlook pl repos trunk/sources --verbose
>   svn:ignore : .classpath
> .settings
> .project
> ]]]
> Currently I'm mainly focused on propget, so proplist doesn't bother me
> too much. But it would of course be even better if proplist behavior
> would match the propget behavior. If anyone has any ideas for this ...
It seems to me that the 'svnlook pl --verbose' output is pretty useless.  Well, OK, not useless, but poor.  IIRC 'svn pl --verbose' was like that and I changed it to use the new format, at the same time as I changed 'svn pg --verbose' to use the new format.  In terms of back-compat, however, 'svn pl --verbose' didn't exist before I added it, whereas I changed the output of 'svn pl --verbose' in an incompatible way.  I simply decided that the latter was an acceptable change.
Apart from backward compatibility concerns, I would totally go for making 'svn pg' and 'svn pl' and 'svnlook pg' and 'svnlook pl' all use the indented & parseable format, and not relate it to the '--verbose' option at all.
I dunno, add a '--parseable' (or should that be '--parsable') option to select the new format?
- Julian
Received on 2012-11-16 16:59:18 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.