On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 15.11.2012 14:20, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> I thought the latest results show that Serf uses less server CPU? So
>> why are we still discussing this aspect? I guess we can stil make
>> Serf better here, but it is already better than Neon if this is the
>> measuring stick.
>>
>> If mod_deflate is not used, then Serf uses considerably less CPU than
>> Neon but sends significantly more data. If mod_deflate is used, it
>> uses slightly more CPU than Neon does (without mod_deflate) and sends
>> significantly less data.
>
> This is what I'd expect given HTTPv2 design.
I am trying to figure out if we are still discussing this issue or
not. It seems like the issue of CPU load on the server is RESOLVED.
Is anyone still questioning that?
I think there are still other issues that we are legitimately
discussing, such as what to recommend around compression, and these
other issues with the log and connections. But can't this issue about
server load simply be closed? I find it confusing that some of these
issues are still being discussed because it is not clear if anyone is
still debating those points.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Received on 2012-11-15 14:34:23 CET