[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Implement '--include-externals' option to 'svn list'

From: vijay <vijay_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:22:47 +0530

On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:45 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: vijay [mailto:vijay_at_collab.net]
>> Sent: dinsdag 13 november 2012 14:06
>> To: Subversion Development
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement '--include-externals' option to 'svn list'
>>
>> On Tuesday 13 November 2012 03:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>>> Attached the updated patch and log message.
>>>
>>>> + /* Notify that we're about to handle an external. */
>>>> + SVN_ERR(list_func(baton, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>>>> + externals_parent_url,
>>>> + item->target_dir, iterpool));
>>>
>>> The docstring of svn_client_list_func2_t doesn't say if it is valid
>>> for path or dirent to be NULL.
>>>
>>> However, you're passing NULL for these parameters before listing the
>>> external. Do we really need these two extra list_func() calls before
>>> and after listing the external? I was expecting them to go away.
>>
>>
>> If we are removing these list_func() calls, how can we pass the
>> arguments external_parent_url and external_target to the callback
>> function? Is there any way to pass those arguments via svn_client_list3()?
>
> Can't you just add the new argument to every call to list_func() that
> applies to an external?

There is no separate list_func() call to list external items. We are
just calling svn_client_list3() recursively for each external, which in
turn calls list_func() using get_dir_contents(). I am struggling a bit
hard to carry forward external information via svn_client_list3(). Can
we add two more arguments external_parent_url and external_target to
svn_client_list3()?

If you want to look at the patch, here[1] is the latest version. Any
suggestions are welcome.

[1] http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-11/0313.shtml

Thanks & Regards,
Vijayaguru

>
> That would allow removing the initial call, while the callee always has the
> information it needs.
>
> Bert
>
Received on 2012-11-15 08:53:34 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.