[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: serf in 1.8

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:47:38 -0500

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Philip Martin
<philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>wrote:

> I have a checkout of the gcc tree, it has 78,000 files. Now it uses
> svn: but if it were to use http: then the serf checkout log would be 4
> orders of magnitude bigger than the neon log. 83 years becomes 1 or 2
> days.
>
> The neon log is independent of the size of the checkout, the serf log
> scales with the size of the checkout. If this were memory we would say
> we have a scaling problem. Do scaling problems not apply to disk space?

If you have a high-traffic site and you choose not allocate the disk space,
rotate the logs or *gasp* don't log.

There are clear solutions to this "problem" that are well-known by any
competent owner. -- justin
Received on 2012-11-13 03:48:12 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.