Re: No Apache httpd for Windows?

On 09.11.2012 19:50, Mark Phippard wrote:
> That is what I expected. I just figured the project would state this
> somewhere. The files are still listed as Unix tarballs which makes it
> sound like it is meant to build on Unix.

It's kind of an informal policy here at the ASF that "source release"
means "all source needed to build on all supported platforms, except
third-party dependencies". :)

Which reminds me that we should consider stopping releasing a separate
Windows zip file, with different contents and different line endings
ourselves. If it's only an issue of unzip being more common on windows
than tar+gunzip, then we can do the same as with tar.gz and tar.bz2 --
just package the same tree in a different archive format.

-- Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com