Re: svn commit: r1405741 - /subversion/upstream/

On 05.11.2012 12:07, Greg Stein wrote:
> This is good stuff.
>
> In a following commit, you added a package in here... do you actually
> intend to modify it?
>
> I would posit we do not need vendor branches unless we specifically intend
> to make local changes.

Yes, I intend to modify it (slightly) so that I can statically embed it
into libsvn_subr, similarly to what we do with amalgamated sqlite.

(Of course I'm hoping that, eventually, we might be able to get those
changes included in the upstream version.)

-- Brane

> On Nov 5, 2012 5:52 AM, <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: brane
>> Date: Mon Nov 5 10:52:06 2012
>> New Revision: 1405741
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1405741&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Top-level directory for vendor branches.
>>
>> Added:
>> subversion/upstream/
>>
>>
Received on 2012-11-05 12:47:57 CET