On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:11:57PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 02:42 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> > Also at the risk of opening a can of worms we need to decide on the wc
> > upgrade issue? I can say that the impression I got from Subversion Live was
> > that a lot of people use multiple clients and that auto-upgrade seems bad.
> > But we also discussed trying to handle reads from an older wcng style wc
> > without requiring a wc upgrade. Can someone drive this?
> I distinctly recall stsp offering to take up the charge on this. :-)
I went ahead and disabled auto-upgrades in r1404856.
This doesn't preclude the option of re-enabling auto-upgrade in case we
can somehow get read-only operations to work without requiring an upgrade.
If there's any further discussion to be had on this I'm happy to participate.
Received on 2012-11-02 02:59:53 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev