Re: 1.8 Progress

Ben Reser wrote:

2) Ev2.  The notes say this is believed to be in a releasable state?  Is there any work needed to verify this?  Do we need to remove the use of Ev2 in any place to avoid releasing with compatibility shims in use? Are we comfortable that the API is complete?

I am not convinced the API is all finalized.  Are there reasons why we need/want to release the API definition into the public name space right now?  If not, I would suggest we move it into the private namespace for now, and then make it public later when we're more confident about it and have some more significant support for it in place.

Does that make sense or am I missing something?

- Julian
Received on 2012-11-01 20:00:50 CET