Re: [PATCH] Implement svnadmin verify --force

On 11/01/2012 10:33 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Agreed. And for what it's worth, I like the second form, especially if
>> the errorful lines go to stderr.
>
> Hmm, it's also reasonable to consider a combination of both: print a
> notification for every revision ("Verified rX" or "FAILED to verify rX"
> on stdout, AND an error message on stderr for each error.

Yes, I think that's ideal, so long as in the error case both the message to
stdout ("FAILED to verify rX") and the message(s) to stderr carry the
revision number. In other words, both streams should be independently
valuable to the reader.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development