[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Implement svnadmin verify --force

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:56:59 -0400

On 11/01/2012 10:33 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Agreed. And for what it's worth, I like the second form, especially if
>> the errorful lines go to stderr.
>
> Hmm, it's also reasonable to consider a combination of both: print a
> notification for every revision ("Verified rX" or "FAILED to verify rX"
> on stdout, AND an error message on stderr for each error.

Yes, I think that's ideal, so long as in the error case both the message to
stdout ("FAILED to verify rX") and the message(s) to stderr carry the
revision number. In other words, both streams should be independently
valuable to the reader.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2012-11-01 15:57:40 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.