Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 19:32:57 +0200:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>wrote:
>
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:58:56 +0300:
> > > stefan2_at_apache.org wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:12:49 -0000:
> > > > Author: stefan2
> > > > Date: Sun Apr 29 09:12:48 2012
> > > > New Revision: 1331883
> > > >
> > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1331883&view=rev
> > > > Log:
> > > > SvnAdmin should always have revprop caching enabled such that
> > > > the infrastructure is being set up to notify *other* processes of
> > > > changes done by e.g. setrevprop.
> > > >
> >
> > What happens if 'svnadmin1.7 setrevprop' is run while a 1.8 server is
> > running? Will the 1.8 server miss svnadmin1.7's changes because the
> > latter doesn't have revprop caching enabled?
> >
>
> Yes. To use revprop caching, all applications
> accessing the same repository must be 1.8+.
This does not seem to be documented.
(It also has the pretty odd side effect that it's not safe to run
'svnadmin1.7 setrevprop' and 'svnadmin1.8 dump' concurrently on the
same repository...)
Received on 2012-10-15 19:37:17 CEST