[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1397993 - /subversion/branches/http-dynamic-prop-namespaces/BRANCH-README

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:22:02 +0200

cmpilato_at_apache.org wrote on Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:44:59 -0000:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Sun Oct 14 01:44:59 2012
> New Revision: 1397993
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1397993&view=rev
> Log:
> On the 'http-dynamic-prop-namespaces' branch: update BRANCH-README.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/http-dynamic-prop-namespaces/BRANCH-README
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/http-dynamic-prop-namespaces/BRANCH-README
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/http-dynamic-prop-namespaces/BRANCH-README?rev=1397993&r1=1397992&r2=1397993&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/http-dynamic-prop-namespaces/BRANCH-README (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/http-dynamic-prop-namespaces/BRANCH-README Sun Oct 14 01:44:59 2012
> @@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ the suite does pass all tests now in the
> trunk client vs. branch server
> branch client vs. branch server
>
> +Note that Bert will probably suggest soon that there be a way to flip
> +off the server-side support for this to accomodate WebDAV proxy
> +configurations where the slave and master are of different pedigrees.

Do we actually support this? I remember a thread a few years ago
concluding that the master and slave had to be similar versions... (but
I don't recall whether "similar" was "same minor version" or "same patch
version")

> +*sigh*. Having to expose feature toggles of this sort to admins is
> +wrong on so many levels.
> +
>
> BACKGROUND INFORMATION
> ======================
>
>
Received on 2012-10-14 19:22:49 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.