Re: Update that pulls a null delta

On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> If an update pulls in a null delta --- eg, because it updates across two
>>> revisions that revert each other --- then it should behave as though it
>>> pulled nothing at all: output no 'U filename' lines, and print "At
>>> revision %ld".
>>>
>>> Right?
>>
>> As a user, I want to see the 'U filename' report.
>
>Perhaps ' filename' would be more accurate? That way the output is
>still clear that "Nothing happened".

Or 'u filename' (lowercase u), for "updated but nothing really changed".

--apb (Alan Barrett)
Received on 2012-10-13 18:00:47 CEST