Re: Update that pulls a null delta

On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>If an update pulls in a null delta --- eg, because it updates across two
>revisions that revert each other --- then it should behave as though it
>pulled nothing at all: output no 'U filename' lines, and print "At
>revision %ld".
>
>Right?

As a user, I want to see the 'U filename' report.

However, if updating to an intermediate revision would have produced
conflicts, then updating to the final revision (which undoes the
changes) should not produce conflicts.

--apb (Alan Barrett)
Received on 2012-10-13 15:16:49 CEST