On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:49 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Honestly, the original phrasing of the docstring remains a better starting
> point, in my opinion. Your changes lose the context that all this
> discussion about depth and unversioned items in a versioned tree are still
> tried primarily to the use of the force flag. So if it were up to me, I
> would restore that paragraph to the state it was in and make only minor changes:
>
> * If @a force is not set and @a path is already under version
> * control, return the error #SVN_ERR_ENTRY_EXISTS. If @a force is
> * set, do not error on already-versioned items. When used on a
> * directory in conjunction with a @a depth value greater than
> * #svn_depth_empty, this has the effect of scheduling for addition
> * any unversioned files and directories scattered within even a
> * versioned tree (up to @a depth).
Committed this unchanged.
Received on 2012-10-06 02:19:35 CEST