On 04.10.2012 17:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 11:01 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> I recall trying to do that and it wouldn't work. I do believe
>> namespaces is how we resolved it for svn:foo style properties. If
>> we're going to be doing svn:foo:bar style properties then we can
>> probably resolve it for svn:foo properties that way by adding a
>> namespace for them. As I recall there was no clean way to tell the
>> client what the namespace meant. Specifically how do you get from
>> randomnamespacename -> cvs2svn:cvs-rev. The places where we could put
>> that information had other character restrictions that made it
>> difficult.
> You may be right. I've not spelunked in the DAV specs for quite some years
> now. I can see that PROPFIND responses carry the sort of information I was
> talking about:
>
> <D:response
> xmlns:S="http://subversion.tigris.org/xmlns/svn/"
> xmlns:C="http://subversion.tigris.org/xmlns/custom/"
> xmlns:V="http://subversion.tigris.org/xmlns/dav/"
> xmlns:lp1="DAV:"
> xmlns:lp3="http://subversion.tigris.org/xmlns/dav/"
> xmlns:lp2="http://apache.org/dav/props/">
>
> But I haven't really looked to see if PROPFIND *requests* can do the same,
> or what the state of PROPPATCH requests/responses are in this respect.
Does XML even define nested namespaces?
-- Brane
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Received on 2012-10-04 20:21:53 CEST