Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip

On 09/27/2012 01:24 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
>> believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
>
> Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0 with our deps package
> going forward? Based on what Greg said I don't think there's any
> technical reason not to. If not I'll be doing so with 1.7.7.
>
> If we do another 1.6 release we probably should use 0.7, since 1.6's
> serf.m4 doesn't know about major 1 of serf.

IIRC, we don't do 'deps' for 1.7 and beyond.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development