On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:27 PM, <stefan2_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sat Sep 22 12:27:49 2012
> New Revision: 1388786
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1388786&view=rev
> Log:
> On the 10Gb branch.
>
> * BRANCH-README: clarify goals and impact of this branch
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/10Gb/BRANCH-README
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/10Gb/BRANCH-README
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/10Gb/BRANCH-README?rev=1388786&r1=1388785&r2=1388786&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/10Gb/BRANCH-README (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/10Gb/BRANCH-README Sat Sep 22 12:27:49 2012
> @@ -3,13 +3,19 @@ svn:// single-threaded throughput from a
> 10Gb/s for typical source code, i.e. becomes capable of
> saturating a 10Gb connection.
>
> +http:// will speep up by almost the same absolute value,
> +1 second being saved per GB of data. Due to slow processing
> +in other places, this gain will be hard to measure, though.
Heh, next question: what are those "slow places" mainly, and do you
have any ideas to speed those up as well? Are there (even only
theoretical) possibilities here? Or would that require major
revamping? Or is it simply theoretically not possible to overcome
certain bottlenecks?
--
Johan
Received on 2012-09-22 19:13:58 CEST