[PATCH] Update antiquated FAQs about what Svn was originally attempting to be

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:19:55 +0100 (BST)

It's time we stopped saying we're attempting to replace CVS and spread a more up-to-date message. So, if no objections, I'll commit the attached updates to the FAQ. - Julian -- Subversion Live 2012 - 2 Days: training, networking, demos & more! http://bit.ly/NgUaRi Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download

application/octet-stream attachment: faq-why-subversion.patch

Received on 2012-09-20 17:20:30 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ben Reser: "Re: [PATCH] Update antiquated FAQs about what Svn was originally attempting to be"
Previous message: Stefan Sperling: "Re: SmartSVN (by Wandisco) - repair working copy feature"
Next in thread: Ben Reser: "Re: [PATCH] Update antiquated FAQs about what Svn was originally attempting to be"
Reply: Ben Reser: "Re: [PATCH] Update antiquated FAQs about what Svn was originally attempting to be"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]