On 20.09.2012 15:58, Andy Singleton wrote:
> On 9/20/2012 8:27 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> There are different projects that fulfill different needs, and we
>> should strive to keep them alive for as long as they serve a useful
>> purpose to their users. Users should freely be able choose between
>> tools and benefit from improvements made to each tool.
>>
>> In the grand scheme of things, the development of git is entirely
>> orthogonal to the development of Subversion. They're different tools
>> made for different requirements.
>
> I would like to get a specific list of cases where this is true. It
> is true that if you have a large, old, mixed revision repository that
> is on Subversion now, you will want to keep your Subversion.
For the sake of precision, I'll just point out that there's no such
thing as a "mixed-revision repository" in Subversion. There are
mixed-revision working copies, but as far as I can see, neither subgit
nor git itself make any attempt to deal with that model.
-- Brane
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Received on 2012-09-20 16:03:44 CEST